Jump to Navigation

Charleston, SC DUI/DWI Law Blog

More wrongful DUI convictions

We've written a number of posts concerning questioning of the reliability of breath test machines. In a decision that could have ramifications concerning South Carolina courts as well, the District of Columbia has now agreed to pay $20,000 to four drivers convicted of drunk driving based on breath test results that are now considered to be unreliable.

The drivers alleged that the machines were improperly calibrated and produced inaccurately high results. It is also thought that many as 400 people were convicted in that metropolitan area based on results that were likely incorrect.

Breath test' results skewed by tobacco juice?

The saga concerning Mike Ditka's sons being charged with DUIs continue. Though what occurred did not involve South Carolina, one of the son's arrests does concern the relevancy of breath tests as used as evidence at trial.

The judge in one particular case did not allow in evidence showing that Ditka's son had a blood alcohol level of .16. The judge made a determination that such results could have been tainted by the use of tobacco juice.

South Carolina felony DUI results in endless charges

A 24-year old South Carolina man has been charged with felony DUI after allegedly striking and killing a pedestrian who was in a crosswalk. The accident occurred at approximately 4:00 a.m. on a Saturday, and the driver is now currently being held in the county jail.

The driver has also been charged with driving under suspension and for failure to surrender his suspended license. It has also not been reported if he as of yet has an attorney.

South Carolina councilman DUI arrest causes embarrassment

A South Carolina city councilman now finds himself facing misconduct charges for the alleged events on the day that he was pulled over for driving under the influence. The councilman's car was supposedly seen swerving across the center lane and was then pulled over, but what followed his arrest is what has garnered the most attention.

When asked how much he had to drink, he was reported as saying, "I drunk a beer." Police then reported that the councilman threatened to kill one of the officers while riding back in the police vehicle. He also was recorded saying to another officer: "You might not have on the right uniform. You might need to put on a robe and a hood."

Proposed South Carolina bill may affect first time DUI offenders

There is a push to change South Carolina legislation requiring first time South Carolina DUI offenders to have an ignition interlock system installed in their vehicle once a driver's license suspension has been lifted. The reasoning behind such a bill is the assertion that a first time offender is really not a first time offender. In other words, alleged suspects had probably been over the legal limit a number of times before actually being pulled over by law enforcement officers.

Such legislation obviously is controversial and this is possibly the reason why it has been stalled in both South Carolina legislative houses. Currently two or more DUI convictions are required before such interlock systems are installed. Once installed, the driver would have to take an alcohol breath test before the system will unlock and the driver can then start up the car.

Prom season means increased law enforcement

Law enforcement officials are promising an increased presence on the road as high school prom season kicks off. Though we certainly don't want young people drinking and driving, what such an increased presence will mean is more arrests for underage drinking. And with such efforts it's also possible that a large number of teenagers will be pulled over for little or no reason at all simply because officers want to check if such young people have been drinking.

What has been reported is that certain counties in South Carolina and throughout the country will be upping the number of police patrols that will be on the road. Such law enforcement officers will also be checking out passengers as well as drivers to see if underage drinking is taking place. Such officials have also asked hotels and motels to watch out for underage drinking and report and suspected activity.

Blood alcohol test results wrongly reported

For South Carolina residents charged with DUI, there are number of reasons for questioning the results of blood alcohol tests. There are only a limited amount of circumstances where blood alcohol tests should be conducted to begin with and everyone charged with DUI should be granted the right to refuse to take such a test.

The number one reason why such results should be questioned, however, is the fact that such results are not always reliable. In Colorado, the department of health is now re-testing more than 1,700 blood alcohol samples as an employee purportedly misreported several test results. Simply stated, he reported blood alcohol levels incorrectly and such incorrect results may have resulted in DUI convictions.

School bus driver charged with DUI

A South Carolina school bus driver was accused of driving under the influence of alcohol after he was involved in an accident that damaged more than three school buses. Police reported that the bus being driven by this individual struck a parked bus and pushed it into a third bus waiting to pick up students.

There apparently were students on the buses at the time the accident occurred, but none of them were injured. The driver has now been placed on leave by the school district.

Elderly Charleston man facing felony DUI charges

The danger of stereotyping is that the stereotypes are often wrong. One cannot judge a criminal act by the alleged perpetrator's appearance, but rather by the evidence. Criminal charges must be proven by the prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt.

The prosecution will need to prove that an 84-year-old Charleston man is guilty of a felony DUI. According to a news report, the charges came as a result of an accident involving the 84-year-old man and a 29-year-old motorcyclist.

Are breathalyzer tests accurate?

Every once in a while we hear about alleged drunk drivers in South Carolina being pulled over and registering scores of 0.3 or 0.4 percent on a breathalyzer test. The almost instant response would have to be, "Are such results legitimate?" This is a legitimate question to ask as the severity of South Carolina DUI penalties are often based upon such readings. Also, a presumption of guilt is often placed upon individuals that refuse to take a breathalyzer test after a DUI arrest.

In a neighboring state an individual had a breathalyzer test administered and a reading of .384 cropped up. Such a reading is so high that questions have been raised as to the accuracy of the result.

FindLaw Network Carroll Law Firm Devoted to Defending Drivers 843-628-2351 or Toll Free: 877-308-4835